All partnering requests
Prototyping of porous structures from digital models
  • Background
  • What we're looking for
  • What we can offer you
  • Who we are
  • Q&A
Have questions about this request?
Get them answered by the team at Procter & Gamble.
Background

Prototyping capabilities are essential in R&D for developing Minimal Viable Prototypes (MVPs), enabling hypothesis testing, consumer feedback, and informing subsequent development cycles. Although we have advanced modeling tools to create digital prototypes, we currently lack a systematic approach to rapidly and effectively translate these insights into physical prototypes. Instead, our MVPs rely on traditional handmaking and pilot manufacturing processes that are costly, time-consuming, and often subject to variability due to their manual nature. Furthermore, these existing prototyping techniques do not fully utilize the modeling insights at our disposal. 

 

Additive and subtractive manufacturing techniques are widely used to create three-dimensional objects by either adding material layer by layer or removing material from a solid block, based on a digital design file. These approaches enable high-fidelity translation of digital designs into physical parts across many industries. However, they are not well suited to replicating non-woven materials, which rely on stochastic fiber networks formed through bulk processes such as air-laying or meltblowing. In these systems, fiber placement, bonding, and resulting pore structures emerge statistically rather than being explicitly controlled. 

 

Existing advanced manufacturing approaches, including high-resolution 3D printing and fiber deposition techniques, offer improved spatial control but remain limited in their ability to reproduce the complex architecture of non-wovens, particularly at micron-scale fiber diameters and controlled pore distributions. As a result, there is currently no widely adopted method to directly translate digital models of non-woven structures into physical prototypes with controlled and reproducible microstructure.

What we're looking for

We are looking to explore and advance enabling technologies that can use the output of our modeling work as direct input for prototyping systems, turning digital insights into minimum viable prototypes for laboratory and consumer testing.

Our vision is to digitally design absorbent articles and rapidly prototype them to test tactile (mechanical), visual (optical), and fluid handling (surface energy) performance. This requires creating porous materials (mainly non-wovens) that bend, stretch, or compress without breaking, while absorbing, distributing, or repelling fluids. We handle multiple scales: prototypes at the centimeter scale (single sheets 50–100 cm², <1 cm thick; stacked layers 50–100 cm², 1–2 cm thick; full products ~50x15 cm, 1 cm thick with complex layers and elastics), with fiber details at the micrometer scale (fiber diameters 1–30+ µm, pore sizes 50–500 µm). Fibers are curly, twisted, with mostly round cross-sections, sometimes trilobal or elliptical.

Solutions of interest include:
  • Melt electrowriting and controlled microfiber deposition
  • Near-field electrospinning or electrohydrodynamic (EHD) fiber printing
  • Voxel-based microprinting of porous fibrous analogs
  • Hybrid fiber deposition with selective bonding
Our must-have requirements are:
  • Ability to execute a proof of concept by fabricating a physical non-woven layer (1.5 cm x 1.5 cm x 0.5 cm) from a digital twin (~5 µm resolution), with potential to achieve ≤5% deviation in pore volume distribution, as verified by micro-CT
Our nice-to-have's are:
  • Clear roadmap describing how the proposed approach could scale to replicate mechanical, optical,, and fluid handling properties
  • Phased development approach, starting with a simplified proof of concept and outlining a path to increased complexity, with identification of key technical challenges and proposed strategies to address them
What's out of scope:
  • Any prototyping approaches based on scale-down or pilot-line processes that mimic conventional non-woven manufacturing methods (e.g., fiber preparation, web formation, and bonding)
Acceptable technology readiness levels (TRL):
Levels 3-9
What we can offer you
Eligible partnership models:
Co-developmentFee-for-serviceLicensingPilot or trial engagementSponsored researchSupply/purchase
Benefits:
Sponsored Research
Depending on the relevance and scope of the proposed work, we will consider sponsored research funding (typically up to $100,000) within the norms of typical industry sponsored chemical research, appropriate for the scope and milestones for the mutually agreed upon research plan.
Data
Access to digital twin CAD files (.stl or .step format) and detailed fiber specifications used in this non-woven (round curly fibers of 25 µmdiameter, forming a web of 30 gsm) to guide and validate fabrication approaches.
Expertise
Collaboration with internal experts in non-woven materials, absorbent product design, and performance evaluation, with experience in scaling prototypes toward manufacturable solutions.
Tools and Technologies
Internal characterization and validation capabilities, including micro-CT analysis, to assess prototype performance against defined success criteria.
Who we are

At P&G, innovation is what we do best. We love finding solutions to problems. With the heart of a start-up and the resources of a global corporation, we are always looking for ways to reinvent every aspect of our business. As we innovate, we find inspiration in people - their needs, values, desires, and passions. The people of P&G R&D know that collaboration is key to unlocking visionary thinking. Our experts seamlessly work together with our external partners in the pursuit of the new, the next, the impossible. Read more here: https://www.pgconnectdevelop.com/

 Learn more
Reviewers
Q&A with Procter & Gamble

Ask the team at Procter & Gamble any questions you have about this partnering request.

Ask your question
Sort by:
Q.
Would P&G consider a closed-loop digital-to-physical workflow: digital twin to fiber-deposition parameters, prototype, micro-CT comparison, then corrected run, paired with a qualified fabrication lab?
1
A.
I guess you mean an iterative approach instead of trying once to print to target, correct? If yes, then yes, we anticipate some iterations and can therefore consider such an approach.
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
June 22, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
We can engineer pore architecture, specific surface area, & spatial gradients via size-selective dip coating from nano/microparticle suspensions. We also seek a partner for an active NSF project. Would this interest P&G?
1
A.
Thanks for reaching out. Unfortunately this is not what I'm looking for. Best regards, Peter
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
June 25, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
Hi, I want to confirm you are looking for 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.5 cm, not a thinner sample - thanks!
1
A.
Whether the sample is 5 mm or 3-4 mm thick doesn't matter. But it needs to be meaningful.
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
June 25, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
Would P&G consider a functional analog acceptable if pore-volume distribution is matched first, while exact fiber placement is treated as secondary to mechanical/fluid performance?
1
A.
No, it is exactly the combination we are looking for.
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 2, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
I would like some clarification on the ~5μm resolution. For non-woven fabric of 50-500μm pore size per your specification, the fiber is random at ~5μm scale. Is varying porosity at ~cm scale OK?
1
A.
What do you mean with porosity varying at cm scale? If you mean that the material has some inhomogeneity on cm scale, the answer is yes. If easier to start with homogeneous material then ok to simplify .
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 9, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
A.
I mean by resolution, what feature of the non-woven fabric are you trying to resolve? Porosity? Layer thickness? Fiber diameter? And ~5μm seems like to small a length scale to resolve for a non-woven fabric of 50-500μm pore size.
1
A.
The objective is to reproduce the overall pore size distribution as well as the fiber diameter. Fiber diameter being in the range of 25 microns, going to resolution above 5microns would be less than 5 voxels per fiber which is too rough/coarse. Therefore, we are looking for solutions that resolve the high resolution AND field of view need.
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 9, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
A.
To make sure I'm reading the requirement correctly: are you looking to deterministically place each individual fiber, or to faithfully reproduce the average fiber diameter (~25 µm) and pore size distribution, with the fibers arranged stochastically as in a real non-woven? I ask because I have an additive manufacturing technology that reproduces the statistical features of the non-woven (porosity, fiber alignment, fiber diameter, thickness) with spatial resolution at ~mm to cm scale, rather than printing fiber-by-fiber. If deterministic per-fiber placement is essential this may not fit, but if a statistical match to your digital twin is the goal, it is much easier to achieve higher throughput without resolving individual fibers.
1
A.
Thank your for clarifying, we are not interested in such a proposal.
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 9, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
Will P&G accept initial prototypes printed with standard lab surrogates (like PCL), or must we use commercial polyolefins (PP/PE) from day one?
1
A.
first proof of concept lab surrogate is ok
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 17, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
Does P&G expect the printing system to apply surface treatments (hydrophilic/hydrophobic gradients) inline, or can these be done as post-processing?
1
A.
surfactant can be applied at a later stage
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 17, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
Do the digital twins consist of pure, single-polymer formulations, or do they include multi-material blends/composites that we must accommodate?
1
A.
multi-component materials is needed mid/long term, but can start simple with 1 polymer only
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 17, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
For solvent-based methods like NFES, are there specific chemical or regulatory solvent restrictions (e.g., halogenated solvent bans) we must avoid?
1
A.
as long as they have no harms to human, at least for lab testing - need to talk more if we anticipate consumer in-use testing
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 17, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
What is P&G’s target turnaround time to print one 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.5 cm sample? Is a print duration of several hours acceptable for this phase?
1
A.
for a proof of concept and initial phase several hours printing is acceptable
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 17, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Q.
Is an approach still 'mimicking conventional manufacturing' if it uses that same base physics but adds new, digitally-driven spatial control not present in conventional methods today?
1
A.
it needs to be able to create a prototype based on a digital file, with no limitations on the fiber orientation
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 17, 2026
Is this response helpful?
1
0
Q.
As mentioned in the requirement "with potential to achieve ≤5% deviation in pore volume distribution, as verified by micro-CT", does this mean we will need a micro-CT on hand?
1
A.
no, we do have a CT at P&G - but it's the method how we would determine success
PD
Peter Dziezok, Director R&D Open Innovation, Procter & Gamble
July 20, 2026
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Sign up to access the full partnering request.
View the details of this request and connect directly with corporate R&D teams at Fortune 500 companies.
Submit Proposal
Deadline: August 7
Refine recommendations
Is this request relevant to you?
Eligible partners
Academic researchersConsultantsService providers (CROs/CMOs)StartupsSuppliers
Seeking partners focused on
Analytical ChemistryBilayersBiochemistryClassical MechanicsCoatingsComputational ChemistryConformation & TopologyElectric Field EffectsElectricalElectrochemistry
28 more

Halo home
Partner smarter. Move faster.
Get new partnering requests
delivered to your inbox.