All partnering requests
Private Company
Ultra-thin coatings for low-friction applications
  • Background
  • What we're looking for
  • What we can offer you
  • Q&A
Have questions about this request?
Get them answered by the team at the company.
Background

We are a major player in the consumer health and grooming industry, committed to advancing innovative solutions that enhance consumer safety and performance. 

 

Current razor blade coatings rely on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) due to their extremely low coefficient of friction and reliable adhesion. However, with the phase-out of PFAS due to regulatory and environmental pressures, there is an urgent need for effective PFAS-free alternatives. 

 

Our internal teams have already tested over 100 PFAS-free candidates. While these alternatives demonstrated potential, none achieved the required combination of low coefficient of friction (~0.02 in normal atmosphere) and strong adhesion comparable to PTFE, leading to coatings that fail after only one or two shaves. Adhesion challenges and insufficient lubricity remain the primary barriers to adoption. 

 

A successful solution that provides lubricity and adhesion comparable to PTFE would support product longevity and sustainability while ensuring compliance with regulatory expectations.

What we're looking for

We are looking for PFAS-free lubricious coating technologies that can deliver extremely low friction, strong adhesion to existing blade coatings (chromium, chromium nitride, or diamond-like carbon), and durability under shaving conditions (normal pressure on blade facet during shaving is ~5-200 MPa). The blades are manufactured from stainless steels and first coated with hard layers such as chromium, chromium nitride, or diamond-like carbon (DLC), onto which the lubricious PFAS-free coating must adhere. While we are open to changing this bonding surface if required, such modifications would involve significant development for full-scale production, though they could be more easily implemented at the testing stage; switching to metallic interlayers is generally simpler than to ceramic ones.

Solutions of interest include:
  • Biomimetic coatings inspired by natural low-friction surfaces
  • High-performance polymer alternatives (e.g., PEEK, PPS, advanced silicones)
  • Hybrid multilayer systems (e.g., metallic or ceramic interlayer + lubricious topcoat)
  • Innovative material systems engineered for lubricity and adhesion
  • Novel deposition methods for ultra-thin lubricious films
  • Sol-gel derived ultra-thin ceramic coatings
Our must-have requirements are:
  • Strong adhesion to the top ~100 microns of thousands of high-aspect-ratio blades (~400 microns in length each)
  • Low coefficient of friction, comparable to PTFE
  • Ultra-thin, ideally <0.5 microns in thickness (maximum 1 micron)
  • Application process must not require curing above 400 °C
Our nice-to-have's are:
  • Coating shows durability indicators beyond lab tests (e.g., extended cycle testing)
  • Demonstrated biocompatibility or compliance with ISO 10993 for skin contact
  • Scalable deposition method suitable for high-volume blade manufacturing
Acceptable technology readiness levels (TRL):
Levels 3-9
What we can offer you
Eligible partnership models:
Co-developmentSponsored research
Benefits:
Sponsored Research
Funding is proposal-dependent and provided in phases, e.g., $50k-$100k for proof of concept, with follow-on funding as the project progresses.
Compounds and Reagents
We can provide test fixtures loaded with stacks of ~500 razor blades for coating trials.
Tools and Technologies
We can adapt the bonding surface for testing purposes and offer alternative interlayers if this would improve adhesion or performance of the proposed PFAS-free topcoat.
Q&A with the company

The Q&A is now closed.

Sort by:
Q.
Does the requirement of no curing above 400 °C mean only post-application curing, or must the substrate stay below 400°C during all steps of applying the top coat?
3
Q.
What is the expected project scale, duration, for the $50K-$100K budget?
KC
Karen Chu, , University of British Columbia
November 17, 2025
1
A.
Thank you for your question, Karen! The project scale and duration for this opportunity are intentionally flexible and will depend on the specifics of each proposal. We will evaluate the scope, timeline, and budget alignment on a proposal-by-proposal basis to ensure the project structure fits the proposed approach. We encourage you to submit your concept with your anticipated timeline and level of effort. Our team will review it and determine the appropriate scale and duration within the $50K to $100K budget range. Please let me know if you have any additional questions!
Team Member, Reviewer, Private Company
November 19, 2025
Is this response helpful?
0
0
Sign up to access the full partnering request.
View the details of this request and connect directly with corporate R&D teams at Fortune 500 companies.
Share partnering request
Complete
Refine recommendations
Is this request relevant to you?
Eligible partners
Academic researchersStartupsSuppliersService providers (CROs/CMOs)Consultants
Seeking partners focused on
AdhesivesAnalytical ChemistryBilayersBiomimeticsChemical PhysicsClassical MechanicsCoatingsComputational ChemistryConformation & TopologyElectrochemistry
15 more

Halo home
Partner smarter. Move faster.
Get new partnering requests
delivered to your inbox.