Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) describes how effectively crops convert applied nitrogen into yield. Improving NUE is essential for farm profitability, as nitrogen is often the most expensive input, and it has major environmental implications due to fertilizer-related greenhouse gas emissions. Improved NUE also enhances phosphorus uptake by preventing nitrogen excess, which supports stronger root development and more effective phosphate use.
Current approaches to improve NUE include urease inhibitors that slow ammonia losses from urea and nitrification inhibitors that delay nitrate formation, reducing leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. While effective and widely used, many of these solutions are not biodegradable, a growing concern in regions like Europe. Biological alternatives such as nitrogen-fixing or solubilizing microbes exist but are often dominated by well-established players.
Innovations that enable better nitrogen management, reduce waste, and deliver measurable improvements in NUE would not only boost farmer profitability, but also reduce agriculture’s carbon footprint and unlock greater value from phosphate fertilizers, strengthening the overall resilience of farming systems.
What we're looking for
We are looking for innovative, sustainable solutions that improve nitrogen use efficiency by enhancing crop uptake and minimizing losses, enabling crops to deliver the same or better performance with less nitrogen applied while reducing environmental impact.
Solutions of interest include:
Natural nitrification and urease inhibitor compounds
Biodegradable analogs of common nitrification and urease inhibitors
Microbial inoculants for nitrogen fixation or soil cycle modulation
Enzyme-based solutions to suppress urease or nitrifying bacteria
Biodegradable polymers or coatings for controlled urea release
Smart delivery systems for timed inhibitor release
Our must-have requirements are:
Introduces new science, delivery systems, or modes of action
Evidence of potential to improve NUE (e.g., preliminary data showing reduced nitrogen losses, improved uptake, or other agronomically accepted indicators)
Biodegradable or environmentally safe design ensuring solutions do not leave persistent chemical residues in soil or water
Our nice-to-have's are:
Pathway toward reducing nitrogen application by ~20% or more over time
Participation in proof-of-concept funding, with additional potential funding for further development.
Expertise
Partners will have access to UM6P experts.
Who we are
OCP Nutricrops drives research through a global network of labs and partners, combining agronomic science, digital technology, and circular innovation. The team has launched the SP2M program, surpassed 5 M tonnes TSP output, and built partnerships with UM6P and Embrapa to advance low-carbon, data-driven plant nutrition.
Can you please specify a range of project duration / total budget that you are looking to fund (e.g., "1 year max, up to $100,000), & whether indirect costs are included? These determine possible project scope. Thanks!
Thank you for your patience and sorry to get back to you. We can fund projects of up to one year with a total all-in budget of up to $100,000. We are primarily interested in high-TRL solutions where the final amount is determined by the solution's maturity, performance, and fit with our needs.
Compared to the amount of primary N absorption plant acquire several fold N through recycling escaping ammonia. It is worth strengthening plants N recycling capacity to improve the NUE in plants under sponsored research
Dear M K,
Thank you for your innovative proposal on N recycling. It's a compelling idea, but it falls outside this call's scope, which is focused exclusively on primary N absorption.
Let me gauge interest for your idea with our teams at UM6P university and get back to you.
Best regards,
Amine
Reasking: Would it be considered responsive to the RFP to deliver micronutrient stimulants (to promote BNF) rather than delivering urea or urease inhibitors?
Regarding the sponsored research, will the results and any developed technologies belong entirely to OCP, or will it be a co-ownership structure that allows startups to also use the outcomes for own product development?
We handle the ownership of research results flexibly, as the best solution can differ with each project. The decision for OCP to fully own the results or to share ownership depends on the specific situation. We base this on how important the technology is for our goals and the partner's own plans. Ultimately, we want to create fair agreements that encourage innovation and allow everyone to benefit.
Thank you for your interest